Showing posts with label Theatre. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Theatre. Show all posts

Sunday, 8 September 2013

Life at the Fringe - Part 1

So I obviously planned to write up every show I saw at the fringe as I went along, but as is want to happen at the fringe life and theatre and more Theatre got in the way of these plans and now that the fringe is over there is not really a point to writing detailed posts about all of the shows I saw. While I feel bad for being lazy and not blogging on time or doing proper blogs for the things. I am a realist and with no stable internet connection at home things probably aren't going to get done on time anyway.

So as follows is a Fly-By Guide to my fringe experience (or at least the shows I saw whilst up there). I will also put down how much I payed for the tickets and do a total at the end, as a here is a rough guide of how much you will spend at the fringe/for my own curiosity. Enjoy!

Day 1
The Mechanisms - Already Blogged about here.
Free
Make sure you check it out as these guys are awesome and exist outside of the fringe bubble!

Showstoppers Mach #1 (Check out their website)
£12.50 Conc.
"In the Jungle the Flighty Jungle"
I did have a post written for this in *gasp* hardcopy but it is at home and I an not. Since I am being lazy you can read about it from my Girlfriends persepective here as I saw it with her.

Day 2
Ant Dewson: Now That's What I Call Musical Comedy
AKA The Dubious Cupboard Gig
Free
Another lazy Link to my Girlfriends Blog as I saw it with her and I don't think I could say it better.

Blind Mirth - Improvised Comedy
Comp Venue Ticket
Still being lazy... :P

Abominations
2-for-1 Tickets=£4.50 each
Same as above.

At this point my lazy blogging expires as my girlfriend went home and I can't just link to her blog anymore...
Ah well time for me to stop being lazy in Life at the Fringe - Part 2 (Coming Soon!)

Monday, 19 August 2013

Titus @Edinburgh Fringe

20-26th August 2013 - 5pm
Paradise in the Kirkhouse (venue 155) - £8 (£7 conc.)

This is a shameless plug for the show i am Teching at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival 2013.

Titus is a dark comedic adaptation of Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus. This adaptation is a 12+ adaptation which takes one of shakespeare's bloodiest tragedies and makes it viewable for those with no stomach for gore while still conveying a reasonably accurate portrayal of the original text.

In its third incarnation Titus has sharpened and darkened since its run at the Brighton Fringe and with a pretty much brand new cast the show is considerably different to its previous incarnartion.

Come along for an hour of "WOE" and "MISERY" which is sure to bring a smile to anyone's face and warm their "dark hearts".

OH and there will be pie!

Sunday, 4 August 2013

Pride and Prejudice

Thurs 1st August - 7:30 Performance
Chatsworth House - £15 Ticket, £3 Programme

This show was sold as being in the Chatsworth House Gardens, whilst this was technically true it is pretty much irrelevant as they did not use their location to their advantage.

Chatsworth House is said to be the inspiration behind Austin's Pemberley manor and it was used in the filming of the BBC version (1995), so the location makes complete sense as part of a tour celebrating 200 years of the text. Knowing this and the way it was publicised myself and two friends went along expecting something of a site specific performance i.e. integration of the gardens and/or the house into the performance however we were very much disappointed. The show was instead set on a TINY stage with a fixed set which in and/of itself wouldn't be enough to turn this show into the complete and utter boring and unimaginative failure it was.

Adding to the disappointment of not even vaguely using the gardens was the fact that the show was WAAAAY over-booked for what the stage size would have acceptably allowed. From where we were sitting it was very nearly impossible to tell the difference between the Bennet sisters let alone catch any sort of nuances of facial expressions or body movement (though this may have also been a fault of the actors as well). Our view was bad enough without even considering the fact that people are rude and inconsiderate enough to set up camping chairs directly in front of where people are using picnic blankets without even checking they weren't obscuring peoples views (there was reserved for picnic blanket space but this was full very quickly as they had well oversold).

I went knowing full well that the story was not a leap out and grab you one or even within my general field of interest but having seen and enjoyed the BBC version I knew that the text had the potential to be enjoyable. The acting was quite flat and in some cases wooden. It felt as though they expected the for want of a better word setting (as they didn't put it to use at all) to make up for the need to act. Mr Darcy was so wooden his pronouncement of love for Lizzie was severely stilted and felt as though he barely understood what he was saying let alone feeling it. The only characters which stood out were Mrs Bennet and Mr Collins who are such obvious archetypal characters that it is hard not to show character with them. Adding to this was the fact that almost ever actor was playing multiple roles which with the fixed set made it impossible to tell where they were/who they were meant to be at the time.

All in all the show was so disappointing that we left at intermission and we certainly were not the first ones to be doing so (people were leaving throughout the whole first act). While I felt dirty doing so, the show and how severely it undershot its potential made us so angry that we really couldn't bear to stay around for the second half.

Now here are several things I think could have been used to improve this performance (though these are purely my speculations):
* Cut the audience size down to, at max, a third of the size it was and put on at least three performances to counteract this; this enables a much more personal and intimate experience allowing the audience to actually see the actors and their movements etc. to greater effect
* Add some lights; you already have things staked into the ground so why not have little lanterns on top to create a bit more atmosphere?
* Use the beautiful surroundings; Chatsworth Gardens are beautiful, so put this to use by integrating it into the performance for example you could use the rose hedge garden-y bit near the house for any "outdoor" scenes and the space in front for "indoor" scenes
*OR you could have different parts of the garden set up as different locations i.e Pemberley, London, Longbourne whilst this would require the audience to move (would need to be advertised appropriately), this would essentially fill the role of traditional scene changes and enable full use of the gardens as well as setting up for a ball scene at Pemberley whilst the audience is at Longbourne
* Taking this further you could use the house; there are large ballroom-esque rooms use them! By having the audience move out through one entrance and in another utilizing different rooms you could differentiate between Pemberley and Longbourne
* Do AWAY WITH THE DOUBLING; Scenes which are meant to be high society balls would be greatly enhanced by having more than 8 actors to dance/participate at them
* WHERE WERE THE AWESOME HUGE DRESSES; you know the ones which are so large it is difficult to manoeuvre in them, surely these would have been warn to such balls? Whilst studying Hedda Gabla (I think it was Hedda) we discovered how much these sorts of dresses influence movement and character as well as how much could be displayed using a hand fan.

So yeah someone let the ball drop on this production. However despite the low quality of the "entertainment" I had an absolutely lovely evening, thanks to picnic-ing with friends, fun conversation and being able to discuss and rant about how things could have been better after.

Wednesday, 24 July 2013

The 39 Steps (Touring)

Wed 17th July - 2:00 Performance
Theatre Royal Nottingham - £20 Ticket, £2.50 Programme

Unfortunately for most of you, you will now have missed seeing the touring version of this show... However don't be sad! The show is still running on the West End for your Viewing Pleasure (until at least March 2014 I think) :D

The 39 Steps
 is a hilarious tongue in cheek spy/murder mystery ( featuring 4 Actors pulling off the epic task of portraying 139 roles over 100 minutes. One of the male actors remained as the same character all the way through, the female actor played three non-overlapping characters and the rest were done by the other two male actors. The character transitions were therefore required to be extremely swift and so there was a huge amount of hat swapping and a myriad of different accents to switch between at high speed. At one point they were even forced to swap characters with each other as they were required to play different characters in conversation with the same one, it was kind amazing.


The set for the show was relatively simple as most of the scene changes were quite obviously and mockingly done by the actors. For example: there is a part where the two villains are waiting outside the lead characters house under a lamppost, as he goes to glance out the window they run on stage with the lamppost, put it down and stand under it, then when he stops looking they run off with it again. The simplicity of the set also enabled flexibility in location, for example: transitioning from a search of all the compartments on a train to running across the train roof. 

The 39 Steps employs heightened physicality and slow motion as comedic tools. This lead to the funniest death scene that I have ever seen, Epicly cheesy "love at first sight" world freezing moments, hair (and coat raising) moments and a fall from a great height. Oh and a shadow puppet chase scene! :D

A quality and humorous show, check it out if you get a chance.


PS. My apologies for the late Bloggage, however I have been busy with a rehearsal weekend, people and house hunting. The next post may also be a little late as I will be out of the country, though I will try to write something up and schedule it to post itself on Sunday (no promises though).



Saturday, 29 June 2013

Merrily We Roll Along

 Thurs 27th June – 7:45 Performance
 Harold Pinter Theatre   £20 Ticket, £4 Programme

Merrily We Roll Along wasn’t my first choice for shows this evening, unfortunately my first choice (A Doll’s House) hasn’t opened yet… Oops a little too keen perhaps :P

Merrily We Roll Along was indirectly recommended to me by a friend’s facebook status; "If you're in London and you've got the moola, go and see Merrily We Roll Along at the Pinter Theatre. Can't recommend enough." which was enough to put the idea in my head when I strolled past the posters in the underground as an option for the evening’s entertainment.

This show is about the hopes and aspirations of three young friends and the gradual destruction of their friendship by a; shall we say Yoko Ono type character and the hunt for fame. Now this all seems very depressing and set to end as a rather depressing show. Well you would be right in thinking this IF the show wasn’t a reverse chronology of the tale. The show opens to a “lively” Hollywood party where we soon discover that everyone is really depressed and wondering where their lives went wrong. Time is wound back through the clever use of the title song and we slowly watch the story (and friendship) unravel, or I should say ravel :-P

The set for the show was mostly a stationary Hollywood Villa-esque house which through the clever use of slide-into-wall-able features and brought-on by the ensemble during song props undergoes a smooth transition through the years and through several different location (house, freshly moved into house, courthouse, office, TV studio etc.). The lighting was mostly naturalistic with the focus sometimes shifting the focus to who is talking as the others continue “talking” etc. and it was also used in one scene to add “wallpaper” to the set.

The songs in the show were quite catchy and I was humming the melody to the title song as I walked to the underground (That means it is good, because there is a Melody you can hum :P – Haha show reference! ).

Despite the unhappy ending *cough* I mean start, the play closes on a very optimistic note and there is a lot of comedy throughout. The character of Mary is quite witty and provides the audience with a lot of laughs and the meta-musical was hilariously cheesy and awful.

You could tell that this is from a slightly older generation of musicals, though it is extremely well done and still very enjoyable for the modern audience. I would recommend it, if you get a chance before it closes on 
28th July but if you are not in London for long/can only see a few shows there are quite a few “Must See” shows (Matilda and Once to name two) before this one. 

Tuesday, 25 June 2013

A Chorus Line

Mon 17th June - 7:45 Performance
London Palladium - £20 Ticket£3.50 Programme

I was fortunate enough to get my ticket discounted down from £65 (Thank you Idea Tap!) so my seat was pretty amazing (4 rows back almost dead centre). I was surprised how much of the music I already knew from this show and I have no idea where I know it from.


The set for this show was very very simple but it really didn't need anything more than it had. It was a black box stage with the back wall able to be rotated to introduce mirrors (and something else at the end *spoilers*). And some mirrors which dropped in at one point of the show and that is it. The majority of lighting was a basic wash, with superb use of stationary spots and the occasional bit of colour. It is a very no frills show but it really doesn't need them, it stands on its own.


Also with the setting and context of the show, flash and glamour wouldn't make sense. The setting is a dance studio, the context; auditions to get into a chorus line for an unnamed show. From the start of the show I found myself choosing favourites, the ones who i wanted to survive and get the job. I'm not usually one for shows like American Idol or the Voice and yet I couldn't help choosing favourites. I thankfully still liked the ones I had chosen at the start (even the ones that I didn't think would get through).


I ended up feeling for most of the characters as they lay their lives, secrets, hopes and aspirations on the line. Except one, for want of better phrasing, the ass and tits character; Val. Now I understand that this character exists for a reason as her story is a real one, people do get given roles based on their looks and miss out if they are not quite the traditional image of beauty/they are flat chested etc. However, despite this understanding and the obvious body issues that she was covering up with the work she had done, I couldn't quite support her as a character. It saddens me that such a character needs to exist, what saddens me more is that I couldn't fully support her. I am not sure whether this was me, how the character is written or the portrayal of the character.

The character who came the furthest in my regards is Cassie. At the start she was just a face in the line (was not one of my initial favourites, in fact I barely noticed her) however as the show unfolded and I heard about Cassie's past I couldn't help but feel sorry for her and in the end celebrate with her. I think this show, is one that speaks to people who are involved in theatre on a deeper level than those who are not. Most of us have been through the audition process at one time or another and know how nerve-wracking it can all be and of course how devastating not getting the part can be.

Overall, a very enjoyable show which has a character or two which everyone in the audience can empathise with. I would recommend this show to all theatre practitioners and to the wider public as a whole.

Friday, 21 June 2013

Stomp

Sun 16th June - 2pm Matinee Performance
New Ambassadors Theatre - £20 Day ticket

Trying to find something to see on a Sunday on the West End is unfortunately quite difficult to do, your choice of shows is very limited as Sunday is the day that most shows have off, I personally think that shows need to start staggering their days off to provide options for those wishing to do something on a Sunday.

Stomp is one of the options available on a Sunday and it is a good one! The thing with Stomp is you know there isn't going to be a story but it isn't trying to be a musical it is quite obviously something else entirelyIt is an enjoyable audience participatory show featuring eight performers in a prop, dance and body instrument show to create music from a range of everyday items. They use everything from Zippo lighters, plastic bags, bin lids and even the kitchen sink to create a rhythmic music which is quite difficult to not enjoy.

The set is designed to be a giant drum kit complete with all the bells and whistles though not in their traditional form. Every item is used within the performance which as someone who has worked on set to have it not be used is extremely satisfying. Their use of props and the broad range of sounds they managed to get from them (a tin cup of water can make a huge range of sounds as it is emptied) provides inspiration for the greater use of props in dances in musical theatre (I love a good cane dance! Check out this classic one).

The audience participation was hilarious as were the actors responses. When it was first introduced the audience took far too long to catch on and kept breaking into applause rather than copying the clapping as they were meant to, the actor kept getting more and more frustrated to the amusement of the audience. Despite there being no words at all the characterisation was really strong and you couldn't help laughing at their interactions with each other and the audience.

I wouldn't prioritise this show over a more traditional musical but if you are looking for something to see on a Sunday, definitely check this show out. It has been running for 11 years in London already and I can't see it leaving anytime soon.

Wednesday, 19 June 2013

Matilda

Sat 15th June - 7pm Performance
Cambridge Theatre - £5 16-25yo Day Ticket, £5 Programme

The first thing I must say is SEE IT! NO REALLY DO IT!

*Ahem*
It really isn't a wonder that this show is consistently sold out days and even weeks in advance unless you are willing to pay more than 
£65 a seat (even then you will be lucky to get one), though in this case I think it actually would be worth it. I was fortunate enough to score myself one of the 16 £5 16-25yo Day tickets which involved queuing outside the theatre from 8:50 (I was still 17th in line, people had been there since 7ish) and being grateful there are two shows on a Saturday.

Now this show is based off Roald Dahl's novel Matilda and has been preceded by an amazing Movie adaptation which was one of my favourite movies as a child. Needless to say this show had a reputation to live up to. Dennis Kelly did a fantastic job adapting the book for stage and the ever amazing Tim Minchin did a superb job complimenting the script and enhancing the characterisation with his music and Lyrics which are extremely catchy (Naughty) and poignant especially When I Grow Up.

The set is wonderful, the way in which the classroom rises from the floor, the bathrooms slips effortlessly back into the stage and its outline is lost is amazingly done. There is one point where Matilda is singing and she rises above the stage on a stack of books, she was about a foot off the ground before I even realised she was moving, it was that seamlessly and smoothly carried out. The integration of the older performers into the younger cast members and the way in which the children (and bigger children) moved the set was well done.  The lighting was beautifully done, it was used to wonderful effect to create spaces and paths for the characters to move through, heightened the mood considerably and was in general, fantastic. The team pulled off some amazing stunts throughout the show such as the disappearing chocolate cake, the ponytailed girl hammerthrow and the self writing blackboard and I would love to know how they were done/be sitting closer to the action to try and work it out.

As with many shows with children in the cast, there are several children cast in each of the roles and they alternate between shows. This adds extra incentive to see the show again as although the show will still be similar each of the children will be unique and as such there performances will be individual. Something which has intrigued me about this alternating cast is how they decide who does which shows? In all of the roles except Matilda (4) herself there are three children sharing the role, you would think that on a set night the same children would perform together but is this the case? I don't know and would be interested to find out. I would also like to know how the children are educated, does the company provide tutors and run classes? Do they attend school like normal children but skip out on Thursday afternoons for the matinee performances?

Anyway you should definitely get yourself along to see this show! Though thankfully it is currently set to run until May 2014 and I could see it extending further. 

Monday, 17 June 2013

The Cripple of Innishmann

Sat 15th June - 2pm Matinee Performance
Noel Coward Theatre - £10 ticket, £4 Programme

I had a few reasons for wanting to see this show:


  • £10 tickets
  • I had seen and enjoyed Privates on Parade which was the first show in the Michael Grandage Season at the Noel Coward theatre (Unfortunately I missed out on seeing Peter and Alice
  • I was intrigued to see Daniel Radcliffe in a live performance

The Cripple of Innishmann is still quite early in its 12 week run and with a name like Daniel Radcliffe in it, the place was sold out. I ended up with a standing ticket which really wasn't too bad and I watched most of the show sitting on the side steps anyway :P

The set for the show was reasonably simplistic. It was a three sectioned set on a rotating stage, one side was the shop owned by the Billy's (Radcliffe) Aunts, another was a bed chamber belonging to the mother of the towns gossip monger/a lodging house in Hollywood and the third was used as the towns makeshift theatre/a beach where boats were launched from. 
The lighting was naturalistic and remained partially dimmed for the beginning of transitions then moved into blackout.

The Cripple of Innishmann is a Dark comedy or a Tragi-comedy. Although it had me laughing a lot throughout there was a lot of darker material which quite often left me silent and solemn. The cast did a terrific job with the Irish accent which they maintained throughout.

Billy's two aunts were a splendid duo who's interactions were highly comedic. Billy's Love Helen was a sprightly lass who you couldn't help falling in love with, despite her putting on a tough exterior, breaking eggs, punching people and fecking all through her dialogue. Your heart breaks for her a little as her softer side is glimpsed briefly in the Bittersweet final scene.  The rest of the cast were also superb and likable characters despite all their obvious flaws.

Then of course there was Radcliffe as Billy. I could see Billy being an extremely difficult role to play and Radcliffe pulled it off Magnificently! Billy is a cripple, though the reasons for this are not expressed within the play it is know he has been this way from birth. Radcliff with the help of a movement specialist worked through the text to get as much in the was of details as they could and decided that Cerebral Palsy fitted the symptoms best (Info given in programme). Daniel donned a locked leg and a hand clutched close to his chest which he maintained throughout, the realism of his movements is difficult to express though suffice to say it was superbly done and if it wasn't a well known actor I think you could easily have though they had typecast the role.

All-in-All a superb show, which I would recommend going to see if you are able before it closes on the 31st August 2013.